I agree. A few of my pieces speak to this, particularly my "Ménage à Trois Between Science, Spirituality and Philosophy, They should have a permanent and mutually satisfying interdependent polyamorous relationship" (https://medium.com/-a634f5446364) and my "Conversational Musings of Verse and Prose on Divine Design, 'Holy holistically, Batman. Einstein intuited evidence for intelligent design.'” (https://medium.com/80a50ade043b). As for evidence, one issue is people define evidence differently. See my "Let’s Talk About Knowing Versus Believing, That I cannot prove something doesn’t reduce it to a mere belief" (https://medium.com/p/21175cf0caee) which stems from my having said in response to a writer's ridiculous claim that science has proved that souls do not exist, "I know souls exist," and the obnoxious replies to my response I received from other readers.

Your title reminds me very much of one of the first essays I wrote on Medium almost four years ago, "Why is it so Easy for People to Believe the Most Obvious Lies yet Require Proof of God?

Conversely, Why Does this Walking BS Detector not Believe 90% of Peoples’ Claims Yet Firmly Believe in Eternal Souls and God(s)?" (https://medium.com/p/339a2a07cc4f), which concludes with, "So, why does this walking BS detector believe in God? Because I look around at the wonders of the universe and achievements by humans both small and large from which divine influence is inferable, and as I like to say with a phrase I learned in law school and long ago repurposed — res ipsa loquitor. Evidential proof is not required when the thing speaks for itself."

PS: I find it interesting how atheists love to comment so vociferously on articles like yours, yet I suspect that's one of the reasons you wrote this the way you did. You knew it would garner engagement. In my essay, "Let's Talk about Atheists and Firm Believers in the God of Abraham, Although their beliefs stand in stark opposition, each exhibits behaviors akin to the other, including shortfalls in critical thinking," (https://medium.com/fe139f4833f3) (my only boosted story) I sought to speak to both sides with this takeaway: "I hope any member of any religion who reads my story may take away that you can form your own understanding of God and possibly stay a member of your religion — only fundamentalists would care that you’ve formed your alternate view. I hope any atheist reading this will take away that there is an alternative, probably several alternatives, to believing in nothing without offending logic and critical thinking and without implicating superstition, but you can forget about proof. That does not mean taking it on faith. You can intuit a belief."