It depends how one uses AI. If one uses it to write the entirety of all their posts, clearly that not only reflects a fixed mindset but also, unless disclosed, is tantamount to plagiarism. If one uses it as a learning tool and works towards writing more and more by oneself, then it would reflect a growth mindset.

It's a bit more complicated when one does not disclose but also uses it merely as a tool and edits in human and personal touches. I'm ok with that use but uncomfortable with the ethics.

Yet for poetry, I'm entirely against its use.

I read an interesting piece the other day about AI and writing. It was clearly boosted, or tons of people read it who want to know how to get away with AI writing. https://medium.com/practice-in-public/these-words-make-it-obvious-that-your-text-is-written-by-ai-9b04f399d88c In addition to tips on how not to be acused of using AI, the writer said: "Compelling, human articles written with AI tools is high-powered and efficient writing. Articles that look and sound like AI is just trashy."

I responded: "I don't use AI myself, except the free Grammarly Chrome add-on running in the background while typing my stories on the Medium website to catch typos, but I agree with this statement. Writers, who write a lot of pieces, using Chat GPT as a tool doesn't bother me if they then put human or better yet, personal touches throughout the piece.

Full AI writing, I won't read the writer again, especially if it's poetry, and I absolutely hate the proliferation of AI generated comments."