The other day I left a comment ( https://medium.com/@marcus17043/i-wonder-how-aristotle-and-kant-would-address-the-trolley-problem-4d58b174d4e2)connecting your Kant and Aristotle essay to the "Trolley Problem" and an interesting Medium essay https://medium.com/pitfall/how-many-people-are-you-ready-to-sacrifice-to-survive-df68307775f and my response to it, which was in part "However, I believe we cannot see all the reasons that things happen and the ripples caused by choices. Perhaps saving the individual will go on to save or better the lives of many more than the few sacrificed now. Who knows?"
The types of decision making that would be built into AI here are cost benefit analysis that make sense in the abstract of a hypothetical but in the actual moment of making such a decision in real life, intution through the soul's connection to our guides, angels, messengers, interdimensional beings etc are what's needed and that can never be programmed. The soul cannot be programmed into a machine.
At the beginning of the interview, EP talks about the totality of what makes us us, and what makes us us, I have come to deduce through connecting various dots and using my intuition, that homo sapiens is a uniquely designed symbiotic species of highly evolved animals and souls. See White Feather’s https://medium.com/grab-a-slice/simultaneous-selves-8eca7d61801d. This is also the story of creation in Genesis when one looks back at the original texts before certain words were mistranslated to man and woman. See
Graham Pemberton’s https://medium.com/@graham-pemberton/what-do-the-first-three-chapters-of-genesis-really-mean-chapter-2-the-creation-of-eve-7aa72143925b and https://medium.com/@graham-pemberton/what-do-the-first-three-chapters-of-genesis-really-mean-chapter-2-further-thoughts-b6797482fd5c.
Simplifying the analysis, Adam and Eve do not represent the creation of man and woman but rather the creation of a species consisting of animal and soul. I had started to think along these lines a couple of years ago when I had the realization that the terms divine masculine and divine feminine actually refer to ego and soul (https://medium.com/new-earth-consciousness/my-reaction-to-two-recent-pieces-on-the-concepts-of-divine-feminine-and-divine-masculine-1f9b899faa17) which I later refined to animus and soul in my https://medium.com/know-thyself-heal-thyself/the-human-spirit-duality-e456c0729e99 in which I explained my view that we are neither humans seeking spiritual experiences nor spirits seeking human experiences — we are simultaneously and inseparably both.
