--

This is why Roe v Wade, and all the other privacy right cases, had the correct holding (conclusion) but have been doomed to eventually be overturned (especially when Senators are too stupid to know that the proposed justices were lying about leaving settled law in place). Roe should not have declared a constitutional right to privacy somehow found in the 14th amendment. Instead of creating a new right, it should simply have held that any law criminalizing or unduly restricting access to pre-viability abortion, elevates some religious views over others and thereby violates the First Amendments anti-establishment clause. https://medium.com/p/4d234daa2e71

--

--

Marcus aka Gregory Maidman
Marcus aka Gregory Maidman

Written by Marcus aka Gregory Maidman

Living 17,043rd human life. I am Marcus (universal name) or you may call me Greg; a deep thinker; an explorer of ideas and the mind.

No responses yet