Yeah, I appreciate that. I can see that my response and one of my others may have come off as a bit cheeky. Sorry. Getting the fields to engage and respect each other is important and was a motivation for one of my well-engaged with essays, https://medium.com/@marcus17043/menage-a-trois-between-science-spirituality-and-philosophy-a634f5446364 subtitled "They should have a permanent and mutually satisfying interdependent polyamorous relationship." Here's one passage from the intro:

"as writers have already married science to spirituality, and I have married spirituality with philosophy, the transitive property would indicate that I could create a committed ménage à trois, with science pleasing spirituality, spirituality pleasing philosophy, and while we’re at it, science and philosophy pleasing each other too. Moving this out of the sexual metaphor, most importantly, so the marriages remain strong, when all the parties can’t always agree, they should still respect their interdependent rights to exist without always having to agree with each other."

My essay quoted one of yours, "What Does “Spirituality” Actually Mean?" with credit to you.