Yes, it makes sense, but....

As a pub owner (small--never got traction--focuses on synchronicity--https://medium.com/illumination/what-is-channspirations-97516b44185a ), and a former editor for Illumination, and as a lawyer, I lean towards not letting anyone say what they want, particularly if it's a conspiracy theory or otherwise violates Medium guidelines or my own guidlelines. At Illumination I largely authored a hate speech policy that goes beyond Medium's.

"Regarding content that propagandizes or fosters the continuation of stereotypes based on race or creed or gender beyond what Medium guidelines may deem to be hate speech, the editors of ILLUMINATION Integrated Publications (IIP) will reject any work that is written primarily to demonize or diminishing the value of another group of people. We will not tolerate such speech whether blatant or implied — whether couched as fact or opinion. We believe that our message of inclusiveness is furthered by erring on the side of excluding a piece that some but not all may find to be hate-filled. The editors of IIP are all from a diverse background of people, and though we occasionally disagree, we recognize we are all human, regardless of our cultural history. Having an argument against a governmental or philosophical policy is appreciated when discussed in a thoughtful and respectful manner but we have zero tolerance for content that targets a specific group, gender, or creed. Unsubstantiated claims or attempts to make broad assumptions against an entire culture will not be tolerated."

Medium's policy does not catch all hate speech, as I wrote about here discussing, without naming him, a very popular poet who really upset me. https://medium.com/illumination-curated/yesterday-jews-around-the-world-observed-yom-hashoah-77eecff25155

Back to yor disclaimer, people can always self publish so if you don't approve of their content, don't, and, moreover, disclaimers of that sort have no legal effect.

I was particularly strict on image issues, and I see copyright violations way too often. Laypeople make assumptions that don't reflect the law. Just today I saw an experienced writer use an image that was copyright protected and she thinks that by crediting the copyright owner and mentioning in her essay the television show from which it's from that makes it ok. It does not. As a pub owner, you should be much more concerned about images than distancing yourself from opinions. See my https://medium.com/illumination/using-copyrighted-images-under-the-fair-use-doctrine-82c4220c470b and my https://medium.com/illumination/defamation-of-character-and-infringement-of-intellectual-property-rights-on-medium-what-every-fa3bd43c08f