--

Yes, the privacy right basis of Roe was poor. However, Roe should not be overturned. It should be affirmed on other grounds (yes, that exists). The other ground on which the holding of Roe, that laws that ban or unduly regulate (the Casey modification which chipped away and did not enhance abortion rights as people who don't understand Casey sometimes write becuse they have read someone eles's talking points) pre-viability abortion codify certain religious views over others and thus violate the bedrock constitutional principle of separation of church and state found in the First Amendment. https://medium.com/politically-speaking/roe-v-wade-should-be-upheld-under-the-first-amendment-20e8b7faa040 The same would be true on a state by state basis. States are prohibitted by the 14th Amendment from passing laws that violate the Bill of Rights.

--

--

Marcus aka Gregory Maidman
Marcus aka Gregory Maidman

Written by Marcus aka Gregory Maidman

Living 17,043rd human life. I am Marcus (universal name) or you may call me Greg; a deep thinker; an explorer of ideas and the mind.

No responses yet